Sunday 27 January 2008

Comparing and contrasting the '28 Weeks Later' opening

Similarities


  • Shot types
    Since both opening sequences contain a chase sequence, similar types of camera work is used. During the chase sequence, a variety of distances, levels and angles are used, along with lots of movement shots.

  • Location
    The opening of '28 Weeks Later' starts inside a house and then moves out into an outdoor area. This is quite similar to the location of our opening sequence.

  • Time of day
    Both opening sequences take place during the day. However, I think that it's much more effective in '28 Weeks Later'. This is because in our opening sequence it seems somewhat unrealistic that in the middle of the day, no passers by would notice a girl being chased by a serial killer. Whereas, in '28 Weeks Later' the person being chased is one of the few humans left and therefore there wouldn't really be anyone else around to think that the chase is a somewhat strange occurence.

  • Enigma
    Neither chase sequence is particularly enigmatic. This is because the person/people doing the chasing are often shown fairly clearly and aren't hidden by a mask or anything. However, other elements of both opening sequences are enigmatic. For example, in '28 Weeks Later' the audience would wonder what's happened to Alice after Don leaves her behind, and in our opening sequence the final pan across the photos on the wall would set up enigma.

  • Editing techniques
    In both our opening sequence and the opening of '28 Weeks Later' use straight cuts throughout the sequence. During the chases, fairly short takes are used to create a fast pace.

  • Sound
    Both opening sequences use non-diegetic and diegetic sound. But, I do think that the music in '28 Weeks Later' works a lot better than our music does.
Differences


  • Themes
    The themes in our film and '28 Weeks Later' are extremely different. 'The Anaesthetist' is to do with voyeurism, obsession and serial killing whereas '28 Weeks Later' is more about a pandemic.

  • Pace
    The opening of '28 Weeks Later' starts off a lot more slow paced than our opening sequence. Then, once the zombie things appear, the pace becomes much faster.

  • End of the chase
    The chases end very differently. In '28 Weeks Later' the person being chased escapes, whereas our victim gets caught.

Finished Opening sequence



Overall, I'm fairly pleased with the opening sequence that our group created. I think the mise-en-scene works well - particularly the character's dress codes and the location. I think we did quite well in terms of shot variation since we had lots of different distances, angles and levels. I particularly like the low level tracking shot of the villain's feet, with the victim in the background. I also think that the diegetic sound worked very well, especially sound of the rustling leaves at the beginning. The slow shutter speed was also really good at conveying how drugged the victim was.


There were also a few things that we could have done better. Some of the movement in some shots could have been a bit smoother (where necessary), but this could really only have been done with even better equipment. And, I think the capture at the end could have had a bit more impact if we'd shot if slightly differently and used some different non-diegetic sound. The final shot (a pan of the pictures on the wall) is a bit too dark, and this means that the picture of the new girl cannot be seen very clearly (particularly in the YouTube video), so it would have been much better if the shot was lit a bit better.

Saturday 26 January 2008

Audience Feedback

I asked my friends to fill in the questionnaire that the group created and here are a couple of responses.

This is a response from my friend who's in university and doesn't normally watch thrillers. I thought it was quite interesting to see how the opening sequence came across to someone who normally wouldn't watch this type of film:


Age: 19
Gender: Female

1. What is the name of this film and can you tell us what happens in the sequence?
The Anesthetist. An 18-year old white girl is followed through a deserted woodland area by a white male. She wears little, even unsubstantial, clothing and has perhaps suffered an assault beforehand and has run away from her attacker or been dumped there. This is maybe suggested through the fact her shoe has come off her foot. The attacker finally catches up with the girl and she is drugged. Her lifeless body is dragged through the woodland. The scene then changes to what the viewer assumes to be the killer’s residence and the audio is a voiceover from a news report on the succession of murders of young girls. We learn that the drug was the "toxic sedative" Chloroform. The killer crosses off photos of the lifeless bodies of the young girls in what could be said to be a satanic shrine.

2. What genre category would you put this film into and why?
Thriller/mild horror due to the content of the piece and its storyline.

3. What do you think the rest of the film will be about?
I think that there could perhaps be a continuation of the killing spree with perhaps more involvement of members of the local community. This would maybe follow the ordeals of more young girls, most possibly all from the same area. Interaction between the killer and the rest of the community would no doubt be a focus. A completely different stance could be taken though and the film could focus on what it was like to be in the killer’s mind.

4. And would you go and watch it?
Though the story is intriguing and the air of suspense leads the viewer to want to know more, in honesty it is probably not the kind of film I would be likely to go and watch at the cinema due to my personal preference in film genres. I am not a major fan of thriller/horror films.

5. What works well in the sequence and what do you think could be improved?
I feel the suspense in the opening shot of the victim on the floor with a shoe missing from her foot is highly effective in gripping the viewer’s attention from the start. I believe the music suits the piece very well as it definitely sets the eerie mood without being too over-dramatic and unbelievable. The way the shot flicks back and forwards between the killer and the victim is really effective as it really picks up the pace and makes it seem as though the killer’s approach is a lot faster than you’d think it would be. I’m not quite sure how to interpret the crossing out of photos by the killer. I think that it perhaps seems a bit over-dramatic and maybe comical to put a cross through the photos with a red pen. However, it does add to the eerie feel of the film with the photos being of the lifeless bodies as opposed to when the girls were still alive.

6. Do you think it is a British, American or European film?
British

7. What sort of cinema would you expect to see this film in? (e.g. Arthouse cinema, Multiplex etc)
I find it difficult to answer this without knowing where the storyline was going. However, from the opening I would probably say it was the kind of film most likely to be shown in more of an Arthouse/independent cinema.

8. What would you give the opening sequence out of 10?
8 out of 10. I’ve perhaps been a bit harsh here with the mark due to the fact I am not a big fan of thriller or horror films. Having said that though, the sequence is definitely gripping and the stark contrast between the woodland scene to the killer’s home is rather chilling. I also think the anonymity of the killer makes it more chilling as the viewer never sees his face clearly. For fans of thriller films I’m sure they would be compelled to watch on and discover more. The way the film grips the viewer’s attention right from the first few seconds is a major achievement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was interesting to see that even though my friend doesn't normally watch thriller films, she was still easily able to identify the genre signifiers as well as guess what the rest of the film would be about.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

And here's the response from my other friend who finished doing her degree in film theory last year:

Age: 22
Gender: Female

1. What is the name of this film and can you tell us what happens in the sequence?
The name of the film is The Anaesthetist. The sequence shows a young woman being chased through the woods by a man, who eventually catches her. We are then shown a series of photographs of other young women. The photographs all have red crosses through them. We stop on a photograph of the woman we saw being chased, and then the killer takes a red pen and draws a cross on her photograph too.

2. What genre category would you put this film into and why?
I would suggest that this film falls under the genre of slasher-horror. This is because it follows several of the conventions of the slasher genre, in particular a young woman wearing white being chased by a mysterious man.

3. What do you think the rest of the film will be about?
After watching this opening sequence, I would think that the rest of the film would follow a group of young girls, some of which would also become victims of the killer. There would be some mystery as to who the killer is, but it would be revealed in the final sequence. I would guess that there would be a "heroine" who would survive the film and stop the killer.

4. And would you go and watch it?
I would go to see this kind of film; its target audience would probably be teenagers to early 20s, primarily male, but also with some female appeal. The film's opening sequence reminds me of several other slasher-horror films, such as Scream, Halloween and I Know What You Did Last Summer.

5. What works well in the sequence and what do you think could be improved?
The sequence contained quite a few low angle shots, these were very effective when showing the girl running away. The framing of the shots was impressive, the focus on the feet instead of the whole body added to the suspense and confusion as to who the man is. The music was eerie and helped to create suspense throughout the sequence. Also, I think the slow pan at the end of the sequence, showing the photographs of other girls, clearly developed the notion that this was a serial killer, as opposed to a one-off kill.
In my opinion, one thing that could be improved is that the audience see too much of the killer's face. In order to further create tension for the rest of the film, I think it would be better to obscure the killer's face either with a mask or an item of clothing, such as a hat, scarf or hood. Also, as it was filmed on a handi-cam, this can be quite effective during chase sequences and for establishing point-of-view shots, but beware of OVER using them, as it can create motion sickness for the audience!

6. Do you think it is a British, American or European film?
The film looked like it would be American. It follows similar patterns to other American films of similar genre, and therfore I would think it would be an American film. It could be perhaps a British take on a predominantly American genre.

7. What sort of cinema would you expect to see this film in? (e.g. Arthouse cinema, Multiplex etc)
I would expect this film to be shown in a multiplex. I would imagine it to have quite a high budget and that it would open on many screens nationwide.

8. What would you give the opening sequence out of 10?
I would give the sequence 7 out of 10. It is effective and enticing, creating suspense and intrigue as to why the killer is murdering these girls. I am not entirely sure I like the title of "The Anaesthetist", it is quite long and complicated, but other than that the clip is well-made, well-edited and well-acted.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

The point that my friend made about 'The Anaesthetist' looking like an American film was very interesting. I think that she was right in saying that the film could be a British take on a predominantly American genre, since most (recent) well known serial killer films are American.

Friday 25 January 2008

Applying Narative Theories to our film/opening sequence

Levi-Strauss's Oppositions

The binary opposites that appear in 'The Anaesthetist's opening sequence and would appear in the rest of the film

Good vs. Evil: Naomi/Amy vs. 'The Anaesthetist'
Hero vs. Villain: Naomi vs. 'The Anaesthetist'
Dark vs. Light: 'The Anaesthetist' vs. Naomi/Amy
Male vs. Female: 'The Anaesthetist' vs. Naomi/Amy


Barthes Action/Enigma Codes

Action codes in the opening sequence:
  • Amy picks up her shoe

  • Amy starts running

  • Amy is hallucinating

  • Amy falls over

  • Amy gets drugged by the killer

  • The killer strokes a photo of his new fixation


Enigma codes in the opening sequence:

  • Where has Amy run away from?

  • Why is she wearing that white dress?

  • Why does he choose to chloroform all his victims?

  • How many girls has 'The Anaesthetist' killed?

  • How long has he been stalking the new girl for?

Propp's Character Types

In the opening sequence, two characters are identified. But, the girl is killed and a new girl is briefly introduced. So, so far in the film only two character types can be identified:

The Hero: Naomi Lawson - on the DVD cover it is implied that Naomi will be the one who finally stops 'The Anaesthetist'

The Villain: 'The Anaesthetist' - 'The Anaesthetist' is the villain in the film since he's the character who has killed lots of people. However, if the film was focusing on his mind and his reasons behind killing, he could be perceived to be more of an 'anti-hero' rather than a villain as such.

Thursday 24 January 2008

Sub-genres

Our group's thriller would most likely come under the crime thriller sub-genre.

A crime thriller is defined as one which is more focused on the criminals and their lives rather than the policemen who are trying to capture them. So, in relation to our film, the 'Anaesthetist' would be the main focus of the film. However, crime thrillers also usually focus more on action rather than the psychological aspects of a criminal. This wouldn't really be the case in our thriller. Although there would probably be some 'action' like the kidnapping of more girls, it would not happen often enough to be the main focus of the film.

Our thriller also has some aspects of a psychological thriller. This is because the film would probably focus on the killer's mind and the reasons behind his actions, rather than his actions themselves.

Other thriller sub-genres include:
  • Horror Thriller
    Horror thrillers contain the element of fear throughout the film. The main character is or will often become the victim.
    Example: 'Hostel'
  • Action Thriller
    Action thrillers often feature a race against time with lots of violence.
    Example: 'The Bourne Identity'
  • Drama Thriller
    Drama thrillers contain more character development than other thrillers and they are often more slow-paced than other thrillers.
    Example: 'Perfume: The Story of a Murderer'
  • Supernatural Thriller
    Supernatural thrillers normally show protagonists either battling an evil paranormal force or stuck in a situation caused by ghosts or other paranormal beings.
    Example: 'The Ring'

Tuesday 22 January 2008

'I Know What You Did Last Summer' chase sequence

The chase sequence leading up to Helen's death in 'I know What You Did Last Summer' was quite inspirational as it contained many similar ideas to those featured in our group's opening sequence.



This chase sequence was quite inspirational since there was quite a variety of distances and levels. I think that this chase sequence was quite inspiring when we were trying to think of the different types of shots for our own chase sequence. I think the rack focus shots were particularly inspiring, though unfortunately we couldn't manage to actually do this properly. Other shots that I thought were inspirational were: the low level close-up of feet running/walking out of frame and the aerial shot of the killer walking towards the shop. We tried out both of these types of shots, but only used the low-level feet close up in our opening sequence. This is because there wasn't really anywhere that the aerial shot of the villain would fit in properly.



Comparing our opening sequence to this chase sequence


Similarities


  • Costumes
    In both 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' and our chase sequence, the victim was wearing a fairly short strappy dress and the villain was dressed in all black. But, our victim's dress was white.
  • Location
    Whilst the actual locations were different, both locations were deserted to emphasise the victim's isolation.
  • Shot types
    In both chase sequences, there were quite a variety of different shots - with lots of different levels and distances.
  • Sound
    Our chase sequence and the chase sequence in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' used both diegetic and non-diegetic sound. Diegetic sound is used to add to the realism of the chase sequence and non-diegetic sound is used to add to the tension of the scene.
  • Editing techniques
    Both chase sequences used straight cuts with fairly short takes. This helps to create and maintain a fast pace throughout the chase sequence.


Differences

  • Non-diegetic sound
    In our chase sequence, the music was a lot more prominent than in the 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' sequence. I think that maybe the music used in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' was more successful, since it wasn't quite as noticeable and blended in more with the scene.
  • Enigma
    Enigma is more important in the chase sequence in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer'. Our chase sequence wasn't really all that enigmatic, because although the audience never sees the villain close-up, he is still a lot more recognisable than the villain in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer'. But this is probably a lot to do with the main focus of the film. So, in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' the main focus is finding out who the villain is, whereas in our film the main focus would be the villain and his new victim.
  • End of the chase
    At the end of the chase, our victim gets caught whereas the victim in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' manages to escape (for now). This is because our victim was the conventional first thriller victim who gets killed, whereas the victim in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' was a much more important/key character.
  • Time of day
    Our chase sequence takes place during early morning/daytime whereas the chase in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' takes place at night.

DVD Cover

Here's our group's DVD cover (created using Paint Shop Pro)




Larger version of our DVD cover